I do not disagree with you that it has the feel of an easter egg. But by that logic the left arrow is an easter egg as well for jumping to the parent node when there is nothing to contract. You could call it a contextual binding.
Its easter eggyness should not prevent it from existing. I would propose that both the contextual binding and the binding of Alt-End be included. On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 11:35:20 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:18 AM, john lunzer <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Right now the right arrow both expands the current node if contracted and >> if already expanded will goto the first sibling. My proposition is to also >> add the behavior to goto-last-sibling if the node has no children and has >> siblings. Currently in this instance there is no behavior. >> >> Please let me know what you think. >> > > This has the feel of an Easter Egg. A binding to goto-last-sibling should > work regardless of whether a node > > has children or not. > > Hmm. Alt-End presently goes to the last top-level node. It might better > be bound to goto-last-sibling, with, say, Alt-Ctrl-End bound do > goto-last-node. > > EKR > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
