You're right, it's not chapter related. But there is still a bug.You can use the previous example, even add further levels of children for greater effect. Make tree fully expanded, select childLevel1 by whatever means. Then use the UpArrow to select the @chapter parent parent node. Now execute expand-prev-level. You will notice that nothing gets contracted.
Additionally the LeftArrow and DownArrow do nothing work. LeftArrow should contract, the @chapter parent node but does now and the DownArrow should navigate down a node but does not. If you press RightArrow you'll see that the tree gets contracted when the next node is selected. What appears to be happening is that the outline is not getting updated after expand-prev-level but also it's locking some keys in the process. On Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 10:41:28 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:59 AM, john lunzer <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> There is a small bug with expand-prev-level and chapters. You must have a >> chapter with a one child node at the next level and then any number of >> child nodes at the levels after that. >> >> Here is an example: >> >> @chapter parent >> >> childLevel1 >> >> childLevel2 >> >> >> Execute chapter-select-parent, then fully expand, then put the focus on >> childLevel2 then press UpArrow so the focus is on childLevel1, now execute >> expand-prev-level. The tree will not contract, but Level 1 will show in the >> status area. If I try to use the DownArrow to focus to childLevel2 I >> cannot, but I can use the RightArrow to focus to childLevel2. >> > > This is, in fact, the expected behavior. The expand-next/prev-level > commands are local to (rooted by) the selected headline. The "root" of the > expansion, in your example, is childLevel2, so nothing more can be expanded. > > Perhaps this is not intuitive, but this behavior has nothing to do with > chapters, as you can verify yourself. I'll entertain an enhancement/change > request, but this is the *intended* behavior and I think the Alt-keys are > good enough. What do you think? > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
