I was under the impression (possibly mistaken) that vr3 was the future and that vr + vr2 were headed for the attic. So now would be a good time to summarise the actual feature sets or differentiating features of vr, vr2 and vr3. I think this will help in reviewing any convincing reasons.
Updating the plugins documentation and http://leoeditor.com/plugins.html#viewrendered-py to keep users aware of PyQt5 issues would be helpful. Terry made a proposal <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/leo-editor/6EVF4Rw8o_I> to include python/Qt compatibility and maintenance status in the docstrings. *Re: 2. Most people will strongly prefer one or the other.* It should be quite clear to users which VR version is actively supported or parked in the attic *Re: 4. Keeping the plugins separate will allow independent development.* It should be clear and documented why different VR's are being kept alive for development. Regards Lewis On Thursday, 22 September 2016 06:45:44 UTC+10, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > I'm having second thoughts about the wisdom of merging VR and VR2 into > VR3, for the following reasons: > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
