I was under the impression (possibly mistaken) that vr3 was the future and
that vr + vr2 were headed for the attic. So now would be a good time to
summarise the actual feature sets or differentiating features of vr, vr2
and vr3. I think this will help in reviewing any convincing reasons.
Updating the plugins documentation and
http://leoeditor.com/plugins.html#viewrendered-py to keep users aware of
PyQt5 issues would be helpful.
Terry made a proposal
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/leo-editor/6EVF4Rw8o_I> to include
python/Qt compatibility and maintenance status in the docstrings.
*Re: 2. Most people will strongly prefer one or the other.*
It should be quite clear to users which VR version is actively supported or
parked in the attic
*Re: 4. Keeping the plugins separate will allow independent development.*
It should be clear and documented why different VR's are being kept alive
On Thursday, 22 September 2016 06:45:44 UTC+10, Edward K. Ream wrote:
> I'm having second thoughts about the wisdom of merging VR and VR2 into
> VR3, for the following reasons:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.