After some further experimenting, links are *not* lost w/ @clean files, but *are* lost w/ @auto-x files. I suppose that's because the .leo file keeps a full copy of the @clean file inside, while the @auto-x data is read into the .leo on load. Am I correct?
Rob.......... On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 1:20:45 PM UTC-5, Largo84 wrote: > > I get the following messages when reopening a .leo file: > > backlink: link to xyz overview from ??? lost > backlink: link from abc to ??? lost > > The lost links are nodes inside @auto-md files, so can I assume that the > link information (are these considered uA's?) is lost because these files > are 'clean' of Leo sentinels? Should I further infer from this that all > linking (or tagging) information will be lost for nodes in @clean or any > other @auto-x files? > > Anyone else seeing this or have suggestions to work around? > > Rob.......... > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
