On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Terry Brown <terrynbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm dithering about whether to create a new branch for this. > I think creating a new branch is always appropriate. Say you don't, and make minor commits A, B, C, related to this. Then commit X fixing something unrelated. Then D and E related to this, then unrelated Y, etc. > Finally you decide the project to revert or restart the project, but unrelated commits are interleaved...Always branch :-) This is a strong argument. So a branch is best practice when a reversion is possible, or when an unrelated change must be made. Neither is true just yet. Perhaps later today ;-) I dislike branches because I forget which branch I'm on, which can lead to complications. Having said that, I'm convinced by what you say. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
