% at_file main.tex:
\section{Section level}
bla bla
bla
\input{sub}
bla
bla bla
...
% at_file sub.tex:
\subsection{Subsection level}
more bla
more bla
...
Currently the main.tex node cannot be a parent of the sub.tex node,
although logically it is. I would like the tree to represent the document
structure.
I will look at Terry's backlink answer - it may help somewhat, although I
would prefer if I could nest the @clean nodes: the tree would represent the
logical structure of the document better.
Edwards solution to put unl's into a latex comment is also interesting. I
did not realize I can ctrl-click on a unl to get to the node. I suppose
that would suggest using @file, because that would put the unl
automatically into the source. I think this is useful, but I would still
have a tree which does not reflect my document structure.
Another solution would be to have a (non-file) tree reflecting the document
structure, and use leaf nodes without children for the content. That would
require an additional level for each content node - suboptimal, but I will
try that too some time.
- Josef
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
