On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
Still it's an interesting script that can't be done with a regex because > negative look-behind assertions must have fixed length: > I meant to say that you couldn't get the same effect using a cff because there is no (reasonable) way to make regex's work as desired. You could, of course, modify the script to that uses regex's. In practice, however, the given predicate suffices. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
