On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 3:50 AM, vitalije <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Done at 41ebaba <http://41ebaba5cc720beefa752649007a9c409c33a5b1>. >> >> Added support for `@data extract-patterns`. >> > > Many thanks for this work. Rev 449d675 revises the docstring for the > extract command. As I write this, I see that the docstring should mention > the new @data node. > Rev 478a7b6 adds the following to the docstring (used by the help-for-command command): You may add additional regex patterns for definition lines using @data extract-patterns nodes. Each line of the body text should a valid regex pattern. Lines starting with # are comment lines. Use \# for patterns starting with #. This rev also reports errors in the regex's in @data extract-patterns without a traceback. This is debatable. The traceback pinpoints the error in the regex, but I think a traceback is too verbose and alarming. It's easy enough to debug regex's at the python regex tester <https://pythex.org/>. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
