On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is good enough for now. We can use the simpler, blocking, code during development. I'm beginning to wonder whether there is a simple non-blocking solution, based on the blocking code. Iirc, the blocking code uses a "busy" form of waiting. A subclass might just override that with a method that does the waiting in the background. I'll investigate this next... Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
