On Thursday, December 7, 2017 at 12:22:52 PM UTC-6, Edward K. Ream wrote: Yes, it is possible to do a prototype in a few hours, with a doctor's > appointment in between. >
I promised a narrative. Here it is: 1. Here are assignments to c.theTagController, *recognized as such*, with kind "c.x=": def def onCreate(tag,keys): c.x= c.theTagController=theTagController class class TagController(object): def def __init__(self,c): c.x= c.theTagController=self 2. Here is the definition of tc.remove_tag: class class TagController(object): def def remove_tag(self,p,tag): 3. And here is the formerly-erroneous call to tc.remove_tag: class class LeoTagWidget(QtWidgets.QWidget): def def callback_factory(self,tag): def def callback(event): call tc.remove_tag(p,tag) 4. Oops. At present the narrative lacks the following: class class LeoTagWidget(QtWidgets.QWidget): def def __init__(self,c,parent=None): self= self.tc = self.c.theTagController It would be easy to add a regex to detect that. *Summary* There is a big difference between this kind of prototype and an actual convention checker. The prototype just matches patterns. Working code would create representations of classes, their methods, functions, assignments, etc. etc. Otoh, the narrative I've just provided does, I think, illustrate my point of view. The present prototype suffices for now. I plan no further work in the near future, but heh, I've said that before... Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
