Hi Edward, I agree that issue #414 had become too long. As I already said <https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/issues/414#issuecomment-345764489>, the proper course of action was to split that issue in various other small issues, but so far only #588 was created and I think that there's at least one other related issue which was not addressed at all: unified cross-uA's searches of nodes. Do you want me to create a new issue for it?
And as a side-note: at the end it's not clear to me what's going to happen with org-mode's drawers...? Will they be imported as uA's or just plain text in node's body? It's not something really important for me, but just got somehow confused by your last comments. Xavier On Tuesday, December 26, 2017 at 9:03:10 PM UTC-3, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > This an Engineering Notebook post. Please feel to ignore, unless you have > contributed to the discussion in #414: Add p.drawer, p.results, etc. > <https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/issues/414> This discussion has > become way too long. > > Today, for the first time ever, I got emacs org mode working. This was > not easy because of typical newbie problems with emacs's init file. On the > plus side, I now have a pretty good understanding of org mode as it relates > to Leo. Here are my conclusions. *Your comments are welcome.* > > *Further support for org mode in Leo has minimal value* > > Org mode is a vastly different beast than Leo. Leo already imports .org > files faithfully in most cases. > > *Showing/hiding drawers has minimal value* > > There will likely be little significant two-way interaction between .org > files and .leo files. Instead, emacs users will likely import .org files > once, and then just use the .leo files. Hiding drawers will add almost no > value to Leo users. > > *Leonine equivalents to org mode features are important* > > Leo would benefit by having some of org-mode's features, but implemented > in a Leonine way. For example, #440: Allow args to @language directives > <https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/issues/440>. > > *#414 has become too long to be useful* > > I would like to summarize in the leading comment of #414 and "archive" the > discussion somewhere. > > *Summary* > > I have lost my appetite for #414. #410 > <https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/issues/440> looks more > interesting. I plan to summarize #414 and either close it or put it on the > back burner. > > Please *do* comment here is I have missed anything in the long #414 > discussion. > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
