Do you happen to know if it's feasible to use QML widgets in Leo? I don't know either Qt or QML, but much of the PyQt code I see in Leo looks very painful, a steep learning curve to climb. I remember when I wrote my Matplotlib graphics plotting and calculator program, finding out how to do even simple things in Matplotlib gave me fits. It's mostly because there is so much *stuff* in there, it's hard to find what you really need to do and how to do the details. It's obviously similar for Qt, and for similar reasons.
Maybe QML would reduce that learning and coding effort. OTOH, it looks like it's much easier to use QML with PySide rather than PyQt. I have no idea if QML widgets constructed using PySide would be compatible with Qt widgets instantiated with PyQt. On Saturday, March 10, 2018 at 8:49:37 PM UTC-5, Terry Brown wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 17:41:47 -0800 (PST) > Thomas Passin <tbp1...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote: > > > If I could step in here some months later, and move to a higher level > > of conversation, I think that there are several levels of engagement > > with Jupyter that we could contemplate. > > I have a long term goal of doing something on the spectrum you describe > as part of this project: > https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/issues/778 > > But don't hold your breath. Although seeing that project and this one > > https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/blob/92ed9d33ac54210de5d97a4612bba2f1fb8f67d5/branches.md#qdock-layout > > are related, and the above is finally moving again, maybe? > > Cheers -Terry > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
