On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 8:04 PM, Thomas Passin <tbp100...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems to me that many python-based systems could be run in a Leo > process, which would give access to their internal APIs. The challenge > would be to get their input and output into Leo cells. > > For non-python systems, in some cases there could be a python wrapper that > handles communication (i.e., the Leo Bridge could be wrapped to communicate > with a node.js server, just as an example, though that goes in the opposite > direction from what I am thinking of). > > To go this route, one challenge would be to abstract the new parts so that > they can be adapted to new systems as easily as possible, without having to > rewrite existing code (except of course for the adapters and wrappers). > All this seems in line with my thinking, which is quite fuzzy at present. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.