On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:18 AM, 'Marcel Franke' wrote: > On surface > [Leo is] open source, but the source if unnecessarily complicated and > unhealthy highly integrated, while still controlled by one single instance > of authority. Access is hard, relevant contribution even harder. >
Terry, Vitalije, Ville Vainio, Bernhard Mulder, Kent Tenney, Marc-Antoine Parent, Paul Paterson and others <http://leoeditor.com/acknowledgements.html>have all made significant contributions to Leo. By any reasonable measure, Leo is open software. Leo's source code *is* difficult in places because it's always dealing with the DAG. That can't be helped. Leo devs are special people. The alternative isn't utopian simplicity, it's org mode. There, everything is a string. This *can* work: org mode simulates Leo's structures using filters. It's a clever idea, but Leo's world is much richer. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
