I think most non-programmers would assume that `print.xxx` implies sending something to a `printer` object (actual paper printer or PDF creator), ie. something configured by the OS as a `printer`. For them (I consider myself mostly a non-programmer), what these commands actually mean is `output to the screen`. So, I agree that clarifying the difference somehow in the naming is a good idea.
Rob... On Saturday, June 23, 2018 at 4:25:12 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > Kent has made almost the identical suggestion. I'm not sure why I wasn't >> more sympathetic to it before, but on second/third thought it seems >> reasonable. >> > > Changing names could, in theory, break scripts that use, say, > c.k.simulateCommand, but that does not seem sufficient reason to reject an > otherwise reasonable suggestion. > > Any other comments? > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
