I expect Emacs is of comparable complexity,how does it offer such good documentation?
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:22 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > I came to Leo because I wanted a programmable text editor that I can > program in Python. I am an Emacs user who did not want to learn Emacs Lisp. > > My dream is that the documents be vastly improved. As it is, when it comes > to scripting in Leo so I can customize my experience, the docs are no help. > I have to ask what I want here or Github. I often find my answers in the > archives of this list instead of the docs. While the community is very > helpful, it is really no substitute to better documentation. Code snippets > often don't work, and the docs refer to features that don't exist, etc. > > My dream is that Leo becomes as powerful as Emacs, and that people keep > producing useful "Leo packages" with Python just as you see in Emacs. > > While I still attempt to use Leo, I've mostly resigned myself to learning > Emacs Lisp. Sadly, it is now easier for me to learn Emacs lisp than to > figure out how to customize Leo with Python. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "leo-editor" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
