On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 10:07 AM Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas < off...@riseup.net> wrote:
> Hi, > > An answer on a particular point. I hope to come back with a more detailed > response in a couple of weeks. > On 26/2/19 8:09, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > Pharo is a good enough language, with advantages I have already described. > However, it is not clearly superior to Python in any significant way. The > syntax is worse, the libraries are unlikely to be better, and the browsers > are inferior to Leo and other Python IDE's. Pharo's windowing system is not > likely better than Qt. > > Without any explicit reference on how to measure superiority for syntax or > libraries or browsers or windowing system, this just fall in personal > preference. > I'm willing to believe that the Pharo libs might offer significant advantages. However, I don't see how that matters much to me, or to Leo. For better or worse, Leo is likely to be based on Python. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
