Edward, you did nothing wrong in your first post. There is no "mistake". Maybe your initial idea for the post was that one, but you ended up expressing the hope that it may help others (it uses to happen to *natural teachers* as you are):
I hope this post helps others ignore their inner critic more effectively So I joined to that final goal with my own experience! Whenever you share something publicly, it's no longer just "yours" and it can end up taking directions quite different from those you initially envisioned... Leo itself is a really good example of that! With my honest respect and gratitude to your work and your teachings which have showed my so much. Sincerely yours, Xavier On Monday, April 22, 2019 at 10:37:02 AM UTC-3, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > Thanks to all for your comments. However, I was making a specific > response to specific criticisms. > > My point, which apparently I didn't convey clearly, was that simple code > could only arise after: > > a) A solid, simple, way of studying the pyzo code, > b) A series of Aha's about what the goals of the pyzo project should be, > c) Close study of the complexities involved in calling pyzo.start(). > > It's fashionable these days for the ignorant to criticize those who have > devoted their lives to understanding science, medicine and public health. > My inner critic's comments were just as intolerable ;-) > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
