On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 9:49 AM john lunzer <[email protected]> wrote:
I dislike having multiple editors/IDEs open because it is often messy and > the "integrated" component of IDE gets lost. > Imo, letting pyzo be pyzo and Leo be Leo is as clean a division of labor as can be imagined. In practice, it would be rare to have both pyzo and Leo open at the same time. But that would "just work" if you actually do that. Integrating pyzo's shell (and related features) simply doesn't work. Scripts run from the pyzo shell aren't (can't be) Leonine scripts. That being so, it makes more sense to use pyzo if you you want pyzo's features. I'm not optimistic that users would see this as a "good" or "clean" > solution to having shell and file browser features available to them. > Then we'll have to educate them. Or better, get the python_terminal plugin working. ...your Doh/Aha moment might be a personal one and that the desire for the > stated features to be integrated *within* Leo will not go away because of > it. > It's not going to happen. Get used to it. Life is too short to add mostly useless features. It's time to do something interesting :-) Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS1X%2Bi3HAcDsQvSx%3DJ5n7pi1b5-UV_ZR37wbB81Td-Dknw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
