On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 7:08 AM gar <[email protected]> wrote: Edward, but does Leo need these hard to implement features? >
No. Leo could be said to be "perfect", just the way it is :-) > What would Leo achieve when it get them? > vim and emacs users who want Leonine features while retaining features of vim and emacs. Don't you think that say improving usability is more preferable then > another compatibility mode? > The picture is a way to *avoid* vim mode. It attempts to get the best of vim editing (in vim) with Leonine features. > Learning curve of Leo is very very steep, it took me more than 2 weeks of > reading and experimenting - and I am still cannot work fluently in it. > Trying to customize UI is a severe pain. > Are you referring to Leo's themes? In any case, this is a completely separate issue. > Plenty of documented features (like vim mode) do not work as described. > That's why I am considering removing vim mode. Leo have too many features which become broken right in the next release. > I am not aware of any significant bugs in Leo 6.0. Is there any reason to add another one? > All enhancements come with costs and benefits. Imo, there could be important benefits to better cooperation between Leo and vim or emacs. *Summary* Closer integration between Leo and external programs such as vim and emacs might solve existing problems with a minimum of new code. In any case, the vim plugin needs work. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS2unEz_RVu2cxTc9CcEUgeNRw8Bnnq6UppFzJYfmV9wSA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
