Thank you for circling back around, it's absolutely appreciated. I agree with you fully; I just sometimes have these grand visions of Leo and want to share them. The dynamic node styling seemed like a potentially simple solution to shoehorning various features into the DAG. I'm such a huge fan of Leo's DAG (I miss it every day when using other tools) and generally feel that is where the investment should be because it feels more "true" to Leo's essence.
On Thursday, August 1, 2019 at 2:16:43 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Thursday, August 1, 2019 at 12:30:32 PM UTC-5, john lunzer wrote: > > The "magic" of emacs is not due to each of these features in isolation >> (though they are all useful by themselves) but due to their >> interconnectedness within the context of registers and buffers. >> > > Yes, I think I understand that. > > Rereading my reply to your comments, you might think I was blowing you > off. Instead, I was attempting to say that each new emacs-like feature > must be integrated with Leo as it is. Yes, big visions are important, but > the overall vision is Leo as it is, not emacs as it is. > > As we go forward, I will welcome specific suggestions to emacs-like > features. But let's get each feature working first. > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/b4c3c422-8144-481f-96d3-be3b1409339c%40googlegroups.com.
