More design problems are arising with pyzo: *1. No minibuffer*
Perhaps the shell or logger tool panes could be pressed into service, but that would be quite a hack. In contrast, both vim and emacs have standard ways of executing commands by name. This is essential for Leo. *2. Settings* Pyzo has nothing remotely like Leo's huge array of settings. Emacs has extensive settings machinery, including ways of specifying mode-specific bindings. Not sure about vim. It's probably not good enough to have Leo's bridge read settings. There must be a way of changing key bindings in pyzo using the bridge's settings. *3. Menus* It would be fairly straightforward to patch pyzo's settings with those in Leo's bridge, but this doesn't look like something anyone would want to see. *Summary* I'm going to sleep on these problems for a day or three. It's not clear whether these problems apply to org mode or vimoutline. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/8a0372d0-6428-43b6-8b66-8b533fd78414%40googlegroups.com.
