On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 7:56:24 AM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: >...if we are ever going to simplify settings, #1316 seems like a regret-free start to doing so.
Could there actually *be* regrets? Could this work possibly be wasted? I don't see how. However we init settings, surely each setting must be represented as an object of some class. But just now I can't explain why g.GeneralSetting should *have *a dict, or *be *a dict. The simplest thing that could possibly work would seem to be a class with a *fixed* set of ivars. I'll investigate. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/7b9e02bd-2ac6-42d8-aa7c-5c9947a4ff0d%40googlegroups.com.
