On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 1:06 PM vitalije <[email protected]> wrote: The problem can't be seen using Leo. When Leo opens this outline it > overwrites clones (as it should do), so the final result is the same node. > The difference is inside the xml content of the LeoPyRef.leo. This problem > doesn't prevent Leo from normal functioning. It just makes a large diff if > saved without any changes. I suppose it would be enough to commit those > changes, but I am not sure which version of the two conflicted nodes would > you rather keep. >
Thanks for this. I have reopened #1526. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS3aT0UZ1ef35z7uuwRZDPbAUV16VCHVMxLcYEBkyAbwRw%40mail.gmail.com.
