On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 9:06 AM Thomas Passin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Monday, March 16, 2020 at 6:23:50 AM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > >> >> As noted in the issue, it's not clear whether changing `g.app` to `self` >> in the LeoApp class would make any real difference. It might well mislead >> people. >> > > I always thought that you had used this kind of idiom as a mnemonic aid. > It has worked that way for me, anyway. > Heh, That's probably right. I almost certainly did so without considering that the consequences, namely that the LeoApp instance must be a singleton. To be clear, imo it's fine with that the LeoApp instance *is* a singleton. Lastly, trying to allow the LeoApp class *not *to be a singleton will likely be far more fraught than anyone, including me, might naively expect. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS2Vh6KwU9ot473FHZ2-8n-yoy67iTzoTkVmwgptw2-bkQ%40mail.gmail.com.
