On Wednesday, May 27, 2020 at 12:15:38 PM UTC-4, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:44 AM vitalije <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> I would only suggest to leave out settings file from the proposal. >> > > Sounds reasonable. If people want "global" settings that can be added > later. > > Hmm. If all templates are local, there is less need for > prompt-for-template... > I'm liking this proposal. My (limited) experience with writing commands is that at first, I only expect to use them within the one outline file I'm working on. The commands and shortcuts would live in the settings tree of that outline. Later, I may find I want to use them with other outlines. At that time, I would copy my command and shortcut nodes to MyLeoSettings.leo. So I wouldn't object to expecting a template to exist within a settings tree. It could be local or global depending on what outline it was in.
I'm agnostic as to whether an @template tree could also be outside of a @settings tree. But if it were outside, and the machinery already had been written that expects it to be in a @settings tree, then I think the extra effort to also process it somewhere else would not be needed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/9cc24e4b-b64b-4d09-882f-65e55411187a%40googlegroups.com.
