On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 12:12:00 PM UTC+3, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:19 AM Shakeeb <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> I've recently come across the pay-to-use Roam Research ( >> https://roamresearch.com), here a nice introductory video ( >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMiodsp6OKo) and Obsidian ( >> https://obsidian.md) which is similar, but available as a desktop app, >> and is free for personal use >> > > Thanks for these links. > > These are basically graph based personal wikis (with backlinks) based on >> markdown with outlining features and graph generation to show an >> information overview or relationships between nodes. >> > > Imo, Leo's DAG (Directed Acyclic List) is better than a general graph, for > reasons which I have discussed many times before. In particular, clones can > not be intuitively defined in a general graph. >
I agree. That's why I cancelled my free trial for Roam after a few minutes. Leo is more powerful, but my desire for universal variable substitution (see my recent post about sections) and first-class wiki features still applies (-: S -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/69647805-921a-4985-b59a-1e25a24af942o%40googlegroups.com.
