On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:28 AM Shakeeb <[email protected]> wrote:
The typical way is to clone the "reused" definition and move a clone as a >> child of each node containing a section reference. Does this work for you? >> > > This works, but frankly I find it a little unintuitive. If I define a > section at any point in the tree, I would expect that in any body of a > child of the section definition node you can naturally refer to the content > of the section without having to clone. > It's the other way around. If you refer to a section, the definition of the section must appear in one of the node's descendants. This behavior is never going to change. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS1eLcnLupEmBJOZ9Lpjq%2BqNS4oSaQ7FiLZvr%3DJPPhUXGw%40mail.gmail.com.
