On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 3:43 PM Félix <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm guessing this indirectly fixes similar behavior that would have been > felt by software that uses leo through leoBridge? (querying for the > language of a cloned+moved node that falls under the criteria you > described) ? >
Yes, I think that is correct. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS30sw%3DHSd90ZQdpTrwyd8B7rbPkODHvKfEtZvn92Eey3A%40mail.gmail.com.
