Thanks re: the clarification, yes they are 'top-level' then. Unfortunately I'm unable to send this _particular_ outline due to client confidentiality, but am happy to run whatever code or tests that you'd like me too.
On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 08:19 -0500, Edward K. Ream wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:14 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I had root nodes like the following, I selected node B and inserted > > a new node below, i.e. using insert-node Y. > > Then I attempted to move X under Y. Note that I repeated this and > > also tried to move deep nodes within X at lower levels which also > > resulted in the error. > > Node X currently has ~6,700 descendant nodes. > > Thanks for the clarification. A note of terminology. The "root" node > is the first top-level node. I think you mean "top-level" node > instead of root node. > > If you can, please send me the smallest node X that demonstrates the > bug. > > Edward > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in > the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. > > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/leo-editor/sANduRjZDVI/unsubscribe. > > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS3MiyXu6xx3nvaU3gzfYRRoK2WhyV6tO3ni85NPCSUK-w%40mail.gmail.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/99cdbe38f4e0383101c925d6d8656364db75f48c.camel%40gmail.com.
