>
> I forgot to include the potential for malware.  Some links:
>
 
According to the research mentioned in your third link that claims half of 
the web sites using wasm use it maliciously, the malicious usage consist in 
obfuscating and mining.

According to the first link, from the figure 4 it is clear that malicious 
site will use users CPU to mine cryptocurrency even if the web browser 
doesn't support wasm. So it is not only wasm's fault.

<https://www.virusbulletin.com/files/7115/3933/8355/dark-side-webassembly-fig4.jpg>



By definition wasm code can't do anything that ordinary javascript in the 
browser can't do. If obfuscation is malicious then I don't know any serious 
web site today that isn't malicious, because every web page uses minimized 
and very often obfuscated javascript. So, as far as I am concerned, 
obfuscation is not malicious per se.

Concerning user tracking, all major social networks use it all the time, 
regardless of wasm. We are writing on the google forum and google use our 
posts to dig some data from them. Who knows how many of us on this forum 
have gmail accounts, github accounts,... all these platforms collect data 
about us and about the way we use internet. They have done this long before 
wasm technology. Therefore I don't see any special threat in using and 
spreading wasm technology.

Comparison with the Flash technology is a bit stretched (IMHO). Flash was 
used to overcome some deficiencies in browsers, their incompatibilities and 
yes flash had some potential for writing malicious software. But wasm is 
much safer and it relies on the browser safety mechanisms, it doesn't have 
to be enabled or installed by the user. It is an integral part of newer web 
browsers, no less than the javascript is.

Vitalije

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/8b3961ac-760f-420f-aa48-1a1fa0eb3efbo%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to