On Thursday, December 10, 2020 at 11:50:39 PM UTC Edward K. Ream wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 4:17 PM jkn <[email protected]> wrote: > >> update, after trying with the ekr-change branch: >> >> - making a change in the .leo file (outside of leo) now seems to be >> noted. I still think the dialog text is confusing though. To my mind >> 'overwrite it' smacks of writing something to disc, and the wording should >> be more like ... reload into Leo?" >> > > I'll change the dialog. > Thanks! > - just touching the file (ie changing the timestamp) externally doesn't >> seem to be noticed by leo, at least not consistently. >> > > That's on purpose. efc.has_changed first checks the timestamps. If they > are different, the code then checks that the contents are different. Only > then does it raise the dialog. > > I thought that might be the case ... understood > - Leo also fails to restart sometimes after answering 'yes' >> > > I'll look into this. > > efc.ask does have some weird timing code, which is probably needed because > the dialog is raised as the result of checks that are made periodically at > idle time. > Yes, I appreciate that. Thanks for your continuing work on this Jon N -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/ce804597-45fe-4b9b-aebc-43ed34081164n%40googlegroups.com.
