On Sunday, January 31, 2021 at 1:46:13 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:
> [email protected] schrieb am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2021 um 17:22:29 UTC+1: > [snip] > OK, I misunderstood your question then - and - I guess I also did not > stress enough, that I was referring *only* to the use-cases, that gar > called a 'general-purpose *note-taking server* tool behind web-server'. > > Here are my answers in *that* context: > > - Create and edit a document as a set of nodes. - YES. > - View your nodes as fairly well-rendered page or pages. - YES. > - Embed and run code. - YES & NO. > - View the embedded code, and optionally embed its output. - YES & NO. > - Embed graphical output of code into a node. - YES. > - Convert a notebook - a set of nodes - into HTML. - NO, I want the > HTML > representation as the default. - As conversion formats I would > probably only > need PDF (in the beginning) > VR3 when rendering does give you html output. For getting pdf output, that isn't currently provided for. There are several ways to get pdf from rst (and, I suppose, MD, though I haven't looked at that yet). It shouldn't be hard to add that capability, if someone really wants it. So from what you say here, probably Leo + VR3 would provide most if not all of what you want from Jupyter. Is that a fair statement? And if not, could you elaborate on what would be missing? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/82be2f0b-561d-4b96-93b6-a7bef8e368f6n%40googlegroups.com.
