For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong * — *H. L. Mencken
xkcd's humorous look at standards <https://xkcd.com/927/> These two quips sum up my thinking about using wrappers for qt. I have just closed #1052 <https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/issues/1052>. Instead, #1846 <https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/issues/1846> will support PyQt6 by having leoQt.py define still more symbols. Yes, leoQt.py is ugly and complex, but I have complete control over it. Leo needs that control so as to be able to work around Qt bugs, including especially bugs in Qt5. All comments welcome. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/eacc7ac9-09ad-47cb-b38f-4af98f3e361bn%40googlegroups.com.
