Hello Edward, Edward K. Ream schrieb am Montag, 5. April 2021 um 07:51:32 UTC+2:
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 1:27 PM Viktor Ransmayr <[email protected]> > wrote: > ... > >> I'm not (yet?) confident / really happy about the removal of the >> "@rst-preformat" option. >> >> The first one is a one-time conversion action & everything's taken care >> of for the users. >> >> For the second one, you're asking the users to perform more steps >> **every** time. - At least for me the workflow is not as smooth as before! >> > > Imo, the new way is just simpler: > > - It's no easier to type @rst-preformat than @rst-no-head. > - @rst-preformat is less flexible than usual because it can't create a > headline. > - Any node in an @rst-tree can contain preformatted text. > - Adding a "::" and indenting following text is too easy to justify > special headlines. > > I was happy to create the conversion script, but imo @rst-preformat is not > needed for new writing. > After having worked for a couple of days with the @rst-no-head approach I fully agree with your call. Concerning the conversion script I've found one more issue, where I'd like to hear your opinion: * The script does create an @path directive in the header of the node - but - it does not remove for example the @ @rst-options default_path=./TL/2021/01/CWxx/ @c in the @path body. - Did you consider removing the now 'useless' default_path' statement - or - the @rst-options section in general? With kind regards, Viktor -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/aa3052cf-8577-4989-a75e-4fbd8d24044fn%40googlegroups.com.
