Imo, using TravisCI provides no significant testing benefits, slows the commit process, and creates unnecessary (and confusing) distribution files.
Instead, devs need only ensure that Leo's test-all command succeeds before each commit. Two recent issues have severely tested my tolerance for TravisCI: 1. TravisCI creates leo.exe, which imo should be hidden but somehow got documented here <https://leoeditor.com/download.html#standalone>. See #2370 <https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/issues/2370>. 2. Within the last several days, TravisCI has suddenly started rejecting *all* commits, even those based on master, which hasn't changed in over a month. See #2421 <https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/issues/2421>. Folks, I think it's time to do without TravisCI. Your comments, please. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/29296a9e-fe6b-45e2-98bb-6015248e246an%40googlegroups.com.
