I'm not very clear about the motivation - what does 'make leoeditor.com more available...' mean?
If it's an idea towards (for instance) allowing more, interested, parties contributing to Leo's documentation, then I think that is a good idea. It's not clear to me whether that is where the suggestion is coming from. I would have thought that this could be done without deprecating leoeditor.com; plenty of projects seem to separate out code and documentation in this way. I don't know if the cost of serving leoeditor.com is an issue... J^n On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 10:51:52 PM UTC [email protected] wrote: > I might be willing, but I'm thinking it would be better to have someone > younger pick it up - you know, better for long-term corporate memory and > all that. I'd be willing to work on getting it all moved over and working > if no one else is able to just now. > > It seems to me that the content at leoeditor.com could be hosted on > GitHub at no additional cost. Any non-commercial GitHub project can do > so. I don't know about linking the domain name to it, but we can work on > that. If need be, we could change all the documentation links and slowly > deprecate leoeditor.com. (I don't know how nostalgic you (@edward) feel > about that domain name) > On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 2:11:43 PM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote: > >> On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 9:24:05 PM UTC-8 [email protected] wrote: >> >>> Currently Speed Ream (@Edward's brother, IIUC) is the registered contact >>> for leoeditor.com and the domain name registrar is Launchpad.com, >>> according to Whois.com. I don't know where the actual server is, who pays >>> for it, or who is authorized to put anything on it or modify anything >>> that's there. >>> >>> I wonder if it's time that leoeditor.com be made more available, at >>> least to actively contributing members of the Leo community. Could there >>> be a home for the server that doesn't require a periodic payment, for >>> example? We don't want it to go away if something happens to the wrong >>> person at the wrong time. And someone outside of {Edward, Speed} needs to >>> be able to know how to access and administer it. >>> >>> Perhaps this is already taken care of, and I just don't know where it's >>> written up? >>> >> >> Thanks for reminding me of this issue. I have just reopened #480. >> >> Iirc there needs to be some close collaboration between Speed and whoever >> is assigned to make the move. The previous attempt failed--iirc both >> collaborators were waiting for the other. >> >> Thomas, are you willing to take on this project? If so I'll give you >> Speed's phone and email. >> >> Edward >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/32886cf1-7ac8-4c98-9768-43d4c9675914n%40googlegroups.com.
