Well, maybe we should have a push to improve the 'visibility' of scripts.leo. I can't remember how it is 'promoted', perhaps some work in that are would be worthwhile.
I see there is no introduction to itself inside the file, so it's not very clear what it's supposed to represent. Would calling it 'example_scripts.leo', and having a preamble in the file, help any? On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 3:20:59 PM UTC Edward K. Ream wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 4:23 AM jkn <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Yes ... 'many' of the scripts I come across, eg. on this newsgroup, need >> a bit of tweaking to run with more modern Leo. But I think a collection >> with some of the concepts 'curated' and commented on would be useful. >> >> Like you, I always forget about scripts.leo; not sure that is the right >> place. >> > > I think scripts.leo is the best of several not-very-good alternatives. > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/aedc8ac1-33fa-43be-8db3-3bd9353250e7n%40googlegroups.com.
