On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 6:46:39 AM UTC-5 Edward K. Ream wrote: PR #3277 <https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/pull/3277> proposes significant changes to Leo's path-related code.
I have asked Félix and Thomas for reviews, without recent results. Perhaps they are reluctant to comment, which is understandable given the scope of the changes. I'll take full responsibility for any problems that may arise. I am asking only for reviews, of any kind. Imo, this PR should be merged into devel soon, so we may thoroughly test it before Leo 6.7.3, due next month. I asked chatGPT to edit this post. Here is the result: QQQ Pull Request #3277 proposes significant changes to Leo's path-related code. I have asked Félix and Thomas for reviews, but I have not received any recent feedback. It's possible that they are hesitant to comment, which is understandable given the scope of the changes. However, I am willing to take full responsibility for any problems that may arise. I am asking for reviews of any kind. In my opinion, this PR should be merged into devel soon so that we can thoroughly test it before Leo 6.7.3, which is due next month. QQQ Maybe not perfect, but chatGPT is a viable alternative to Grammarly, which I used to check the original post. Now let's feed chatGPT back to Grammarly. Heh. Grammarly scores the chatGPT version as "a bit unclear". In all other respects the scoring is as before: correct, very engaging and "Delivery: just right". Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/6bee644f-5c4f-4436-b6d8-cc3366d49afbn%40googlegroups.com.
