+1! On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:20:09 AM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote:
> I recently asked myself whether Leo's code should use Pep 8 naming > conventions. The short answer is an emphatic NO! Such changes would have > massive impacts on LeoJS and existing Leo scripts. > > I entertained this question for two reasons: > > - Leo could define an *@alias* decorator to retain compatibility for > class, function, and method names. This decorator would warn (once) about > each deprecated name. > > - I was thinking of creating tools to make the required changes > automatically. > > However, the names of routines are only part of pep 8's recommendations. > The names of many vars and arguments would also have to change. > > *Summary* > > I'm never going to change names extensively within Leo. It's a terrible > idea. > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/546e5f5a-04ad-4797-8e65-e0d5dac67760n%40googlegroups.com.
