No, I haven't tried it. I'm not even sure I would want to. Think about how the Windows file explorer works. If you copy a file and paste it, it gives the pasted file a name that includes "copy" if there is another file with that name in the same directory. If there isn't another file in the target directory, the copied file gets pasted get the original, unmodified name. File managers on linux work the same way.
I'm just saying that Leo ought to act the same way as the file managers where copying nodes are concerned. It's the way way everyone's file manager already works, it's what one would expect, and it's not state-oriented unless you mean the state of whether or not there is an existing name On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 7:40:10 AM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote: > On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 9:35 AM Edward K. Ream <edre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm not going to [do a state-oriented paste-node]. > > My apologies. I was too brusque. > > Thomas, have you tried making paste-retaining-clones your default for > ctrl-shift-v? I'm wondering whether you would encounter any problems. > > Thanks. > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/24d46380-caa1-4a5e-adf7-75ad397484b2n%40googlegroups.com.
