Thanks for your insights Offray,

Perhaps AI is also like the advent of electricity, the internet or nuclear 
power: potential for great positives, but also negatives, if unchecked, or 
in the hands of mal-aligned intentions/people 

Glad you've enjoyed that little audio-experiment with that podcast! I might 
do a little more in the following weeks! 

Félix

On Friday, September 20, 2024 at 12:58:53 PM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 17/09/24 11:04, Edward K. Ream wrote:
> > I should emphasize that all these AI tools should be valuable as 
> > starting points.
> [...]
> >
> > The same strategy should work with a blog about Leo or LeoJS. Revise 
> > the results until they pass expert judgement. Revise the settings to 
> > eliminate any hint of sexism.
> Agreed. The main problem I see with AI is when is unchecked, in several 
> senses: the information it produces, the expropriation of value from 
> creators who gave unwillingly training data, the huge ecological cost 
> and waste behind it, the race, gender and other bias it confirms, among 
> a long list of problems. The critical approaches from initiatives 
> feminist[1] and decolonial[2] perspectives can help us to keep AI, its 
> hype/dangers and uncritical uses at bay.
>
> BTW, the Leo podcast is pretty impressive and hopefully we will go to 
> other AIs, like Engelbart's Augmented Intelligence, underlining the 
> human and communities role in the computational labor, data production 
> and curation, hopefully for the benefit of everyone instead of the 
> enrichment of few (as usual).
>
> [1] https://feministai.pubpub.org/
> [2] 
>
> https://botpopuli.net/artificial-intelligence-and-the-feminist-decolonial-imagination/
>
> Cheers,
>
> Offray
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/39b48986-7dbc-443c-962d-04399b6e3739n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to