The DeepWiki pages have a box at the bottom labeled "Ask Devin about Leo-editor". Just for fun I asked it to comment on the quality and clarity of the architecture. Here is the result:
https://deepwiki.com/search/comment-on-the-quality-and-cla_4c6638af-00b0-443d-b486-29937852d0fb This query took a long time, perhaps 15 minutes or more. The summary at the end of the response is: *Overall Assessment * *The architecture of Leo Editor demonstrates several qualities of good design:* 1. *Clear separation of concerns: The MVC pattern and modular organization make responsibilities clear.* 2. *Information hiding: Components encapsulate their implementation details.* 3. *Stability: The architecture has remained stable for over 20 years.* 4. *Extensibility: The plugin architecture allows for extension without modifying core code.* 5. *Transparency: The documentation is honest about fragile parts of the system.* *The architecture's clarity is evident in how consistently it's described across different documentation sources. The principles are well-articulated and appear to be consistently applied throughout the codebase.* On Sunday, April 27, 2025 at 11:39:53 AM UTC-4 Thomas Passin wrote: > I just tried it on my own GF4-Project. It seems to have done a fairly > decent job overall - > > https://deepwiki.com/tbpassin/gf4-project/ > > We may have to wait some time for a User's Guide, though ... > On Sunday, April 27, 2025 at 11:13:12 AM UTC-4 Félix wrote: > >> Thank you for sharing this! >> >> On Sunday, April 27, 2025 at 8:56:31 AM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote: >> >>> I suspect it may have come from old, obsolete documentation rather than >>> code., >>> >>> On Sunday, April 27, 2025 at 8:28:22 AM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 8:20 PM Thomas Passin <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I see that some parts are very obsolete. >>>> >>>> I have no idea. This is generated doc based on 27 April 2025 (4c67af >>>> <https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/tree/4c67af>), which is a >>>> relatively new snapshot. >>>> Of course, the generated doc has lots of defects, maybe this defect >>>> comes from the old but not deleted code. Just a guess. >>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/69a2f2b6-7d5a-498f-bf86-9fb614206738n%40googlegroups.com.
