But note that the decision went on to say that there are other sections of law that the President could use to impose at least some tariffs. Still, it's a big one, all right.
On Thursday, May 29, 2025 at 12:19:23 PM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote: > From the summary of this unanimous decision > <https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cit.17080/gov.uscourts.cit.17080.55.0.pdf> > . > > QQQ > The court holds for the foregoing reasons that IEEPA does not authorize > any of the > Worldwide, Retaliatory, or Trafficking Tariff Orders. > ... > This conclusion entitles Plaintiffs to judgment as a matter of law; as the > court further finds > no genuine dispute as to any material fact, summary judgment will enter > against the United States. > ... > The challenged Tariff Orders will be vacated and their operation > permanently enjoined. > There is no question here of narrowly tailored relief; if the challenged > Tariff Orders are > unlawful as to Plaintiffs they are unlawful as to all. > QQQ > > This is the best news I've read in a long time. > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/79ca48f9-93c6-419e-8cf4-dcab773bc389n%40googlegroups.com.
