Hi Brian. Great question. Indeed your concept could be very useful. I'll try my hand at it this week-end.
And yes leojs is great, but like Thomas said, it's a full fledged leo that is not a minimal html readable tree that you would like Thanks for your interest in Leo 😃 Hopefully ill get something that would fit the bill in a few days when i have some free time Félix On Thursday, September 4, 2025 at 9:54:42 AM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote: > With LeoJS in vscode.dev, outlines have to be in a GitHub repository. > The OP probably doesn't want to be limited like that. > > On Thursday, September 4, 2025 at 5:54:59 AM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 9:32 PM brian <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> @edward >>> My goal is to generate a self contained html file that I can send to >>> someone so they can view the content I created without installing leo. I'm >>> using leo as an outlining tool and not as a software development tool. >>> With the html someone can double click the html file and view a >>> representation of the outline in a browser. Some people have issues with >>> installing software so I'm trying to avoid forcing someone to install leo. >>> Some businesses require IT sign off before even thinking about installing >>> software. Having to install leo could be a blocker. LeoJS >>> <https://boltex.github.io/leojs/> will not work since it has to be >>> setup with VS code. It is easier for someone to install leo than setup >>> LeoJS <https://boltex.github.io/leojs/>with VS code. A non-dev will >>> be lost in VS code. >>> >> >> My advice is to use vscode.dev if at all possible. >> >> Edward >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/d6156fc6-479a-4c08-83e8-fc755d051f02n%40googlegroups.com.
