On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 10:51 PM Félix <[email protected]> wrote:

> @Edward
>
> You're right - unknown html files, unlike safer PDF file, images, word
> documents, etc., are a security risk and people should not 'open/run' by
> double clicking on a html file willy-nilly.
>
...

> But I'm a web developper, so I could recognized the imports he made as
> standard bootstrap from known 'content-delivery-networks' or "CDN" which
> are harmless and expected.

To be clear, I wasn't worried that *you* would write malware :-)


>   *So yeah, people should not open those if they are not sure of having
> confidence in them like I did.*


I'm happy to leave it at that. I'm not sure about Brian's management, but
that's not my problem.

For the record, I think converting a .leo file to a .html file is an
interesting project worth doing, regardless of the security considerations.

But like Thomas pointed out, the more common and dangerous stuff are
> contributions to popular open-source repositories that are then compiled in
> sites/software all over the place! :O
>

Right.

>
> @Brian
>
> Examples are coming soon!!


I too am looking forward to them.

Edward

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS0Yk%3DjDV0zNN7KpGYPpyuA_uSjg3z1iYfnNU%2Bt16hnMRw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to