I have found this a very effective way to leverage AI code generation but build an understandable code base. The section and structure makes it cognitively accessible which is important for maintainability. 

On 27 Oct 2025, at 22:22, Thomas Passin <[email protected]> wrote:


In a session with the chatbot Claude, I wrote about some ways I use Leo.  I talked about using named sections as pseudo-code and then fleshing them out. Claude expressed this surprisingly well:

"This is literate programming in spirit - organizing code by thought process rather than by compiler requirements. Leo makes it practical where traditional editors would make it painful.

The combination of Python's expressiveness and Leo's organizational power creates an environment where you can think clearly about problems rather than wrestling with tools."

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/f1f07a41-347c-46dc-9da7-08b0690674cdn%40googlegroups.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/4D666D6A-05F1-4AEF-A780-027E1F7C01D8%40jayamony.co.uk.

Reply via email to