Leo issue #4472 <https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/issues/4472>is a hobby project.
I have just asked Gemini 3 to critique my idea and design. This gemini3 thread <https://gemini.google.com/share/343f1a7fb5d8> is the result. It is way more detailed, thoughtful, and knowledgeable than my initial musings. This sentence captures my initial vague idea exactly: Your proposal essentially transforms Pylint from an *Inference Engine* (which is slow and guess-prone) into a *Logic Validator* (which is fast and deterministic). I'm not sure what to do with all this insight, but I am profoundly impressed with Gemini 3. I might ask the pylint devs for their comments. But first, I must provide examples where pylint has failed to detect real errors in Leo's code base. Such errors have been fairly common in the past. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/29e60399-dba2-4ee5-b2b8-cb6d9b26038bn%40googlegroups.com.
