On Wednesday, July 28, 2004, at 10:05 AM, Dave Williss wrote:
It looks like the X libs are NOT two-level namespace, but it appears that our applications trying to use them are. It should be a simple matter to force them to build as flat namespace, although I've already made the necessary change to our startup program to set the DYLD_FORCE_FLAT_NAMESPACE before running them.
Curious, with Apple's X11 0.3, LessTif applications built as a two-level
namespace work just fine with a flat namespace libXt. One problem
I had with flat namespace LessTif applications (they were built that
way; presumably the same effect would be present with DYLD_FORCE_FLAT_NAMESPACE
set) and the Apple X11 betas was very slow startup times if the application
also used OpenGL. The extra time was spent relocating symbols. As I
recall, applications which just used LessTif and X had acceptable startup
times.
Eric Branlund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Lesstif-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lesstif-discuss
