On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 07:40:47AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
> It's pretty simple to make sure something runs, but this problem was that when
> it ran, it didn't do the right thing, which is much more difficult to do
> without the help of the application. The tests for Xm have been written
> specifically to test their own behaviour.
Yes, but my intention was way simpler just to get those samples
started/run.
At least this is a nice check for major problems, like
SIGSEGVs, etc.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
